[64-bit] Re: flash stopped working after update?!
NoOp
glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Sun Aug 9 22:40:46 UTC 2009
On 08/09/2009 02:18 PM, Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sun, 8/9/09, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> From: NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> Subject: Re: flash stopped working
>> after update?! To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com Date: Sunday,
>> August 9, 2009, 10:13 AM On 08/08/2009 08:48 AM, Leonard Chatagnier
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorta thought that and is why I tried plain text
>> again. What about
>>> all the list complaints about using HTML which to me
>> looks great?
>>
>> Plain text seems to be working on this one, so whatever you're
>> doing, keep doing it :-) Now if we can just get you to limit your
>> posts to less than 80 columns...
>>
> I am not doing anything except using Yahoo web mail and occasionally
> changing from/ to rich text/ plain text.
>
>>> Also, where did you come up with "adobe-flashplugin"
>> as it's not in
>>> my repos???
>>
>> Partner repos. See my followup to Karl in the original thread.
>>
> Sorry, but I do have that repo in software
> sources(archives.canonical.com/ ubuntu jaunty partners) as I suspect
> Karl does. Everything Karl says he has so do I. Also, There is no
> Adobe-flashplugin in my downloads even after aptitude updating and I
> do get a hit on the canonical entry. Aptitude search or show doesn't
> show it, locate doesn't show it, etc, etc. I also have r32 in my
> about:plugins and I'm feeling for Karl's plight as it is mine too. I
> also don't have that mozilla adove-flashplugin dir that you
> mentioned(I erased the post so not exact but be sure I looked for the
> one you listed). Something is very amiss here; are you sure your
> talking about the 64 bit and not the 32 bit software that Karl and I
> both have? The only flashplugin that works for me is the one that has
> "npwrapper" in the path file name which I think means it's 32 bit
> requiring ia32libs and npwrapper to be installed. I think I
> remember that flashplugin has a 64 bit version but if so, Karl and I
> haven't installed or set it up yet. Maybe with my viewpoint added
> you can see where we are going wrong. Hope so anyway.
Seems that:
http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/
doesn't have the 64 bit version.
I suppose you could try the 64-bit Alpha if you feel adventurous:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/releasenotes_64bit.html
<http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html>
<http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz>
<http://monespaceperso.org/blog-en/2009/05/01/how-to-install-flash-64-bit-on-ubuntu-jaunty-904/>
Note: if you use the last, be sure to modify to the above
libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz version.
What the heck, give it a try; it can't be much worse that the existing
32 bit using npwrapper.
...
>
> Please call my level on your cell phone. I've looked for it in the
> pasture and it's still lost-:o)) BTW, am I still sending long lines
> on this one. Wish we could find a solution as I much rather use web
> mail.
Is that a 32-bit or 64-bit level? Try pinging it :-)
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list