Question about partion in Ubuntu
Eberhard Roloff
tuxebi at gmx.de
Tue Nov 4 08:35:43 UTC 2008
Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
>> The problem of this is it is pretty >waste. Installing Ubuntu may >never needs 160GB spaces. >However, home directory can >easily exceed 160GB.Is there >anyway, I can make home >directory, say 280GB, and leave >40GB for the system?
>
> I think you may want to use LVM. But:
>
> 1) It requires users to fully understand concept of LVM.
> 2) It may need you backup everything and install from scratch that some thought don't have the time to.
> 3) It is quiet picky on filesystem choice. Some filesystem can be expanded or shrinked, some just don't have that feature yet.
> 4) Disaster recovery is quiet work-intensive. You may want to have a regular backup plan.
> 5) However when you employ LVM, it pays. LVM is a feature that enterprise class servers use to handle storage challenges.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
I would like to emphasize issue No. 2.
Backup, Backup, Backup.
When you are doing it like this, LVM is a very good and flexible solution.
However, your intention is to distribute your data over two single
disks, which are not mirrored ex. in a RAID configuration.
Now if only Disk of two fails, _ALL_ of your data will be gone. This is
similar to RAID 0 in regard to data security.
So Backup, Backup, Backup
Kind regards
Eberhard
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list