Installing Apache 1 (but not Apache 2)
news at pointerstop.ca
Wed Mar 5 17:01:11 UTC 2008
shaap at uhweb64208.united-hoster.com wrote:
> Because _this_ compiled version of apache needs _these_ packages for
> running. The needed packages also depend on others. That's the way
> software is organized.
You know, you seem to have jumped into this list for the sole purpose of
arguing with me about everything. Yet you clearly aren't actually reading
Please come back when you get a modicum of both common sense and civility.
>> I think you really must be asking why you got the "apache2-utils"
>> package, and I have to admit I'm not sure - it doesn't seem like it
>> should be a dependency of apache.
> apache depends on apache-common depends on apache-utils
Not on modern systems, as Apache 1.x doesn't even exist on Gutsy (I know
he's using Dapper, but it's hard for most of us to see those dependencies).
And that's just plain annoying. We are not in love.
More information about the ubuntu-users