Installing Apache 1 (but not Apache 2)
sbassi at clubdelarazon.org
Wed Mar 5 16:06:45 UTC 2008
On 3/5/08, Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca> wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand either the question _or_ the answer. I don't
> think the question was really "who" but "how".
My question is: Why I can't just install Apache. I don't care if
Apache2 is installed or not, as long as get a working copy of Apache1
working (with mod_perl).
> You _can't_ install only apache (and _WHY_ would you not install apache2?).
I don't want to install Apache2 because I am trying to setup a problem
that states that it will not run under Apache2 (this is the program:
> I think you really must be asking why you got the "apache2-utils" package,
> and I have to admit I'm not sure - it doesn't seem like it should be a
> dependency of apache.
> otoh, if you're really asking why your install _failed_, you should probably
> have given us the next couple of lines of output...
Yes, I want to know why if I did: apt-get install apache perl, I donde
have a working copy of apache (instead, I have):
Setting up apache (1.3.34-2ubuntu0.1) ...
dpkg: error processing apache (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Sebastián Bassi (セバスティアン). Diplomado en Ciencia y Tecnología.
Curso Biologia molecular para programadores: http://tinyurl.com/2vv8w6
GPG Fingerprint: 9470 0980 620D ABFC BE63 A4A4 A3DE C97D 8422 D43D
More information about the ubuntu-users