Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Tue Feb 26 05:42:29 UTC 2008
> steve wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> | Conor Schaefer wrote:
> |> I think a lot of people fail to realize the remarkable amount of
> |> resources poured into the average binary install file... for instance,
> |> ever use subversion to compile something from source? You would be
> |> astounded at the amount of space you need to allot, just to create a
> |> several megabyte large install file.
> |> Programming is a beautiful, beautiful thing.
> | I agree, but, that install file should be what the customer gets. Why
> | do I need to have several compilers and create my own install file every
> | time i want a different program or just an update to one i already
> | have.
> compiling is done on a per machine basis, and is tailored for your cpu,
> memory, video, etc for optimum speed. with windows you get what they
> give you, you like it or not, you have no choice. linux is choice, open
> source. windows is not.
> Windows does some things right and thats one of them.
> this is what is exactly WRONG with windows. dumbed down to run on every
> machine at the same speed.
> I have been around PCs since DOS 2.0, but I am not a programmer, why
> should I
> | need to be to work with Linux?
> you dont need to be. if you want pre compiled packages your free to use
> what is available from the repositories. if the program isnt available
> from the repositories then you need to download the source and issue 3
> simple commands, configure, make, make install. whats so difficult with
> | IMHO and YMMV and all that. :-)
> | Mike
> What was so difficult with that is that I had to download and install
> multiple packages to accomplish those three simple commands. I probably
> had to install over 25 megabytes of ancillary programs to do those three
> simple commands. That extra software is now resident in my system
> using up my disk space. Not all software is available in the repos.
> All Window software comes with an installer. My point with Windows is
> that it is easier to install software. Whether on not it is custom
> fitted to my system is immaterial to me. I want results, I am more
> interested in the destination than the journey so to speak. I use Linux
> for a variety of reasons but I am not blind to its faults or to Windows
> pluses for that matter. You have a different philosophy when it comes
> to using the software and that's fine. I don't want to get into Windows
> vs. Linux, it's been done to death. I do want to thank everyone for
> helping me with getting those three simple commands to work, I
> appreciate it.
Silly question....but you wanted to "compile" something and not simply
When was the last time you did a compile on Windows? Do you think doing a
"compile" on Windows is any less "expensive"?
More information about the ubuntu-users