Telnet Server installation failed
news at pointerstop.ca
Mon Feb 11 20:58:24 UTC 2008
Ted Hilts wrote:
> Derek Broughton
> You wrote: "Sigh..."
> After all the replies I asked myself why it was not obvious. The reason
> is that in my wildest dreams if the package was not on the server disk
> then why would it be any where else.
I completely agree with you. I was trying to express a general
disappointment, and not blaming you - I _know_ that new users aren't going
to find it obvious.
> I still have to find the instances of Telnet and associated libraries
> that were created from Debian and get rid of them.
That's not difficult. "sudo aptitude purge telnetd" should handle it.
> But to answer your question, make your installation more comprehensive
> by putting references to all these repositories in the "sources" file
> but include usage remarks and comment out the references to the
It's so many years since I had stock sources list, that I can't be sure, but
I really thought the default was like that.
> But even then how would one know that the Telnet Server
> was in the Universe repository without examining the repository by
> getting a listing of all its contents. There should be a comment to the
> effect that if a package is not available it might be found in the
> Universe repository.
And that could be really easily done with the "command-not-found" package,
which intercepts an attempt to run a program that doesn't exist and
suggests "apt-get" - it certainly should also suggest that the repository
may need to be enabled - but that's only useful if you actually run the
correct command in a terminal
> Maybe then there would be fewer newbees like me
> doing dumb things.
No, they'd just be doing different dumb things :-) And you sure don't have
to be new to do dumb things!
More information about the ubuntu-users