Noobie question concerning upgrading, was Re: Daper -> Fiesty

[Mario Vukelic]

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:41 -0300, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> 
> I have to disagree. I humbly believe I fit the description, and
> actually tried on a test system, manually with aptitude (both in the
> CLI, and the TUI) and tried correcting every broken dependency I
> could, only to realise the expression "dependency hell" is very
> apropriate. I'd say it's not only unsupported, but in fact unfeasible,
> but YMMV.

I didn't say it's easy :) You made me curious, what exactly were the
problems

> Something will HAVE to change from dapper to the next LTS (the
> H-something).

What do you mean?