lightest possible weight ubuntu?
Steve Flynn
anothermindbomb at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 00:42:51 UTC 2007
On 02/11/2007, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > At the moment, it's CLI based only as I lack the patience of a saint.
>
> Ineresting... I ended up giving a 128M module from my A21M to my son for
> his T21 so I only have 128M left in the machine. I swapped hard drives
> as well & it now only has Win2K on it (that's what had come with his
> T21). I'd been waiting to get another 128M module before loading Gutsy,
> but noticing this thread I've decided to try xubuntu @ 128M...
> downloading the xubuntu alternate iso now & will report back on how it
> goes :-)
Don't expect miracles but I think you might be quite surprised.
Obviously it'll swap like a bugger but it'll be a fair bit more
responsive than 2K.
I long for the days when I used to run 98 quite happily in 64 meg.
Saying that, AmigaOS3 in a meg.
<rant>
Can someone explain to me how I used to connect to Demon and Fidonet,
pick up and relay mail, wordprocess, burn CD's, and do pretty much
exactly the same stuff as I'm doing right now in around 1/2000 of the
memory?
</rant>
/sigh
--
Steve
When 1 person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many people
suffer from a delusion it is called Religion.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list