Ubuntu and Perl
cyclewood_ltd at yahoo.co.uk
Wed May 30 11:28:35 UTC 2007
Yeah, I've never had problems using CPAN but I would like to keep things cleaner.
Does anyone know why /usr/local/share /usr/local/lib is first in INC? Surely for a system to try to remain consistent (for use of a better word) surely /usr/share /usr/lib being first would be better.
Also, am I right in thinking that adept would automatically install in to /usr/share /usr/lib whereas CPAN would by default install into /usr/local. I've never really taken care to look at this before now.
The more I think of having duplicate packages (latest from CPAN for me) dependent packages installed by Ubuntu, the more I don't like it.
I really am trying to be good ;) but might just end up going the same old way. Would Python/Ruby have the same problems?
Andy Harrison <aharrison at gmail.com> wrote: On 5/30/07, Anthony Gardner wrote:
> After many years of installing my own version of Perl next to the system
> installed version, I'm now trying to be a good boy and just use the system
> installed versions of Perl / Apache / mod_perl2 etc.
> But, as I'm now more restricted, I need some questions answered.
I just install from CPAN. The attempt at creating packages for all
the good perl modules is valiant, but there's always something you
need that will be missing.
That's one thing I wish would be adopted from FreeBSD. There, when
you install from CPAN, it creates a handy package on the fly out of
the modules you install. Much easier when you're ready to remove or
upgrade a perl module, no unexpected files loitering about.
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users