Data partition sharing between Ubuntu & WinXP
gt at fallendusk.org
Thu May 24 04:26:28 UTC 2007
First off, what's with all the swap? That's just a waste of space, as
chances are with 1.5gb of RAM you won't ever be swapping anyways.
FAT32, I would stay away from for a data partition (esp of those large
sizes) as you can't have files larger than 4GB.
So basically, you're left with either ext2 or ntfs-3g. I don't have much
experience with either, but probably would go with ntfs-3g.
Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
> Looking for thoughts on this...
> I've got about 90GB of data I want to protect from loss/damage. I'll
> have a machine that will dual boot Ubuntu & WinXP (maybe 2K?). Yes, I
> will need Windows for some things.
> It'll have one 60GB drive (PATA) 2 PATA 80GB drives, and a 80GB SATA
> drive. 1.5GB RAM.
> Initial thought is as follows:
> 80GB hda - 10GB Ubuntu, 10GB WinXP, 57GB Data1 (mounted as /home), 2GB swap
> 60GB hdc - 57GB Data1 backup copy, 2GB swap
> 80GB hde - 75GB Data2, 2GB swap
> 80GB sda - 75GB Data2 backup copy, 2GB swap
> (well, assuming the SATA drive gets marked as sda, but that's neither
> here nor there...)
> Software RAID mirroring and/or LVM won't work, since WinXP wouldn't be
> able to read the data.
> At first, I figured the data drive would all be Fat32 using rsync. I'd
> also like to figure out a way to compare files, to see if maybe one got
> Then I though about using ext3 on the Data partitions, since there is a
> utility for mounting ext3 drives in WinXP (as ext2). I'd be in Ubuntu
> most of the time. But what about WinXP screwing with the ext3 filesystem?
> Then I saw that ntfs-3g is now in the Universe repo. So maybe I could
> go that way, and not worry about XP whacking the files.
> Or there is the option of having ext3 on the main, and ntfs on the
> backup? Or should I just forget it all and go with Fat32?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the ubuntu-users