network newbie question
Wei-Yee Chan
chanweiyee at gmail.com
Sat Mar 3 01:07:38 UTC 2007
Patton Echols wrote:
> When I converted my office to static IPs
I thought U were on DHCP?
> it was because I bought a new
> copier, which can also be a network printer, and network scanner, The
> last part it needed static IP to send scans to. So there's lots of reasons.
>
Yes, if U have a network printer-copier-scanner, it would certainly
require a static IP. Whenever a technician comes to install a new
network printer-copier-scanner for my clients, he'll ask me for an
available IP.
> Sure. and even though my home net is not a perfect performer, it's been
> pretty good. But in light of your comments about things that can go
> wrong, I'm re-thinking whether any of the minor annoyances I've had
> could be resolved by static IPs. So I appreciate the insight. Thanks.
What sort of "minor annoyances" are U referring to? I'm not too sure
about your network structure, but for commonly accessed machines like
file servers, it helps to fix the IP. When U give a machine a static
IP, and enter the machine name and IP into your client computers' hosts
file, U are helping with the name resolution. As a static IP doesn't
change, your client computers (on their own) will know exactly where to
go all the time.
Take note that I'm not suggesting that U assign a static IP to every one
of your computers. What I do is fix some IPs but leave the rest on DHCP.
Regards,
Wei-Yee Chan
http://chanweiyee.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20070303/0009b7be/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list