aptitude x apt-get (was: Re: Dapper - more updates skipped)
Felipe Figueiredo
philsf at ufrj.br
Thu Sep 21 01:58:25 UTC 2006
Em Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:15, John Dangler escreveu:
> > I would suggest to use aptitude pemanently instead of apt-get. It can be
used
> > both in a text UI, or in CLI (with a syntax very similar to apt-get).
> I'm not a fan of aptitude... the interface is a bit too kludgy for me.
> I'm used to the commandline in Unix/Linux, so apt-get update && apt-get
> upgrade are fine for me. The problem I reported came from the desktop
> update, though.
As I said, you can do the same things (install, update, upgrade, dist-upgrade,
purge, download, clean, etc) just substituting apt-get for aptitude.
Aptitude has several enhancements over apt-get, the most important IMHO being
an additional flag for packages that are installed automatically as a
dependency. This way, when one package marked with this "automatic" flag gets
orphaned by its parent dependencies, it is selected for removal
automatically.
I too didn't like aptitude's interface, but I just got used to it, once I
discoverd the above facts. It is fairly good to do several routines at once.
AFAICT apt-get could already be a symlink to aptitude, and I wouldn't
notice. :)
regards
FF
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list