ubuntu and kubuntu
Scott
geekboy at angrykeyboarder.com
Sat Sep 2 20:30:15 UTC 2006
I really need to do a better proofreading job...
Scott wrote:
> GNOME developers tend to treat users like idiots. In the past few years
> it seems to have gotten worse with each release.
>
> A wise man once said:
>
> "This 'users are idiots, and are confused by functionality' mentality of
> Gnome is a disease. If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will
> use it. I don't use Gnome, because in striving to be simple, it has long
> since reached the point where it simply doesn't do what I need it to do.
>
> Please, just tell people to use KDE."[1]
>
>
> I agree with all but the last sentence. I prefer to use both. There
> are things I like about both KDE and GNOME (e.g. better than the other).
And what I meant here was...
I agree with the spirit of that statement. I prefer to use both. There
are things I like about both KDE and GNOME (e.g. better than the other).
>
> I was in GNOME when I wrote this.
>
> GNOME is simpler and in some aspects that's a good thing, in others it's
> not. It comes down to personal preference.
>
> I find that GNOME looks less like KDE OR Mac OSX than KDE does. GNOME
> is just "unique".
>
What I meant to write was "I find that GNOME looks less like *Windows*
OR Mac OS X than KDE does. GNOME is just "unique".
UGH. Yeah, I really need a proofreader..
--
Scott
www.angrykeyboarder.com
©2006 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list