Dual Core / Dual Processor AMD
Stephen Brown Jr
stephen.brown75 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 13:36:19 UTC 2006
It's enlightening to see other's experiences with dual core. I have been
contemplating for a while picking one up myself. I just essentially
"downgraded" my system to components that are a little less powerful, when
in essence I should have just upgraded my CPU to a dual core. Only reason I
downgraded was that I used to be a hardcore Windows gamer and I have
essentially retired from it now and figured my high end hardware would go to
wasted based on my current usage.
Reading what some people are doing changes my thoughts a bit!
On 10/27/06, Ouattara Oumar Aziz <wattazoum at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Felipe Alfaro Solana a écrit :
> > On 10/24/06, Peter Clutton <peterclutton at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi, I'm about to purchase a new workstatioin just for ubuntu and had a
> >> question about smp support and benefits. Would appreciate any tips or
> >> pointers to other information.
> >>
> >> If i purchase a dual core opteron or two single core opterons and
> >> install the smp kernel, will i be getting the full benifits of
> >> multitasking, as in, it doesn't require multithreaded applications to
> >> get anything out of it?
> >
> > If you purchase a dual-core processor, you will be able to take
> > advantage of both cores even for non-multithreaded applications,
> > provided that you run more than one task a time. For example, you can
> > rip two MP3 songs at the sime, one running on each core. For example,
> > when compiling software, you can use the -j flag to make in order to
> > compile several targets in parallel.
> >
> > So, unless you are going to play games (some titles won't take
> > advantage of multi-core CPUs) it will probably worth. I'm using a
> > MacBook Pro laptop which has two cores and it's extremely responsive.
> >
> >> Is the support as stable as running ubuntu on single core/processor,
> >> which i have found very stable? For instance is it at the stage of 64
> >> bit support, where there are a few issues and not all software is
> >> supported etc.
> >
> > For me, SMP support is extremely stable.
> >
> >> One final question, can i use smp with the two cores running 32bit smp
> >> kernel, even though the opteron is 64 bit? I dont care about the the
> >> advatntages of 64 bit, they would not affect anything i do.
> >
> > Yes, you can.
> > But running a 64-bit-enabled kernel and 64-bit applications will
> > provide greater performance. For example, 64-bit systems allow
> > applications to use more CPU registers, which can turn in more
> > performance.
> >
> > So, unless you intend to run applications that are totally broken for
> > 64-bit, I would go with a 64-bit distribution. I have running SUSE on
> > 64-bit Athlon X2 processors and they perform extremely well.
> >
> >> If all is totally good, I would pay for the dual core/processor,
> >> otherwise will pay for the best single core i can get. Thanks in
> >> advance
> >
> > I'd go with a dual-core system but that's my personal opinion :-)
> >
>
> Very impressive ! next time I buy a computer, it'll be a dual core :)
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061027/f088e32d/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list