Flash plug-in : CPU salesman ?!
Chris
ubuntu at functionalfuture.com
Tue May 16 11:34:04 UTC 2006
Vincent Trouilliez wrote:
> Ah, thanks Peter. So it's not (completely), the end of the world.
> Flash animations sites aren't inherently CPU hungry then, it's only this
> particular site.
> Still, the guy who made all these animations probably created them with
> Macromedia's own program.
> If that program is capable of producing such inefficient animations,
> then I think Macromedia is still to blame...
This is highly dependent on the OS, browser, and version of Flash. In
order from best to worst performance (on my hardware):
1. It runs the best on Windows with IE
2. OS X with Safari
3. Windows with browsers other than IE
4. OS X with browsers other than Safari
5. Flash runs the absolute worst on Linux, especially with Firefox
I was running some older version of Flash and that page was using 15%
CPU in Windows/IE (in VMware), after upgrading to the latest Flash it
uses 30% or so. In Linux/Firefox it uses well over 60% CPU on my
machine. OSX/Safari was about 25% CPU with OSX/Firefox pushing 90% CPU.
That page is a horrible design. There are an insane number of Flash
instances all running at the same time.
--
// Chris
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list