jonnyro at jonnyro.com
Wed Mar 22 18:58:05 UTC 2006
On 3/22/06, Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:30:27PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Placing swap on a raid1 is kind of silly. Swap space by definition
> > is temporary so there is no need for the security raid1 provides.
> Is it? The purpose of raid is to survive a disk dying. When is the
> disk going to die? Possibly when the computer is running, in which
> case having the swap on raid 1 means you don't have to crash.
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Jonathan S. Romero
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users