key-test

[C Hamel]

On Thursday 16 March 2006 20:35, Darryl Clarke wrote:
> On 16/03/06, C Hamel <yogich at sc2000.net> wrote:
> > In past msgs my signing keys (two of them) come back bad on this list &
> > good when I send to myself.  These keys have been around the block,
> > imported to a couple previous Dapper builds, and worked okay. This is
> > only a key-test. Sorry for any inconvenience... I have re-imported & will
> > file a bug if they come back as bad.
> > --
>
> You need to sign the content/message body itself (see many other users
> on this list) and not attach a signature.
>
> When any spam, av, maillist daemons add stuff to your messages it will
> invalidate the attached signature.
>
>
> --
> ~ Darryl  ~ smartssa at gmail.com
> ~ http://darrylclarke.com

I believe that is what I am doing.  At least I know it works on Breezy, 
Gentoo, SuSE, et. al., and not on Dapper.  The setup in Kmail isn't that 
hard, and it is uniform between all.  That's my puzzle.  If I go back to 
Breezy & look at the msgs they'll doubtless be okay.  If I'm wrong, I'll post 
another saying so, but they were okay, yesterday.
-- 
	...CH

This message was scanned for Spam and Viruses by Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall