Stupid end-user tricks: darcs for /etc and /boot

[Alexander Skwar]

Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>>> it prompts the user to view changes to important files 
>> 
>> Well, again not quite true. Not just to "important" files, but to
>> *all* files stored in one of the "CONFIG_PROTECT" (the 1st list)
>> directories.
> 
> Seems like you are nit-picking since this point is unrelated to the OP's 
> position.

I'd like to add one more thing to this - maybe I was indeed
nitpicking. But I did that, just to show, that his complaint
in reality wasn't valid or was based on a misconception about
how etc-update works. And I was doing that, to clarify what he
wrote, as he wrote wrong things which were rather "FUD like",
ie. could be understood in a very wrong way.

> He's saying that etc-update is dangerous.

Which is wrong.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Dreams are free, but there's a small charge for alterations.