Ubuntu a poor choice for servers
Scott Kitterman
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Tue Jul 11 17:54:00 UTC 2006
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:36:40 +0800 "Charles Yao" <yaocharlesc at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>So what would you guys recommend for servers? thats easy to to administer
of course. we do not have any IT staff to configure it if its gonna be
complicated.
>
>--
1. If you are talking about a server that will be exposed to the internet,
they I would recommend you hire someone who knows what they are doing.
Failing that, for internet exposed servers, use a hosting providerwho will
ensures their servers are administered securely.
2. If you are talking about a server for internal use, then even without
dedicated IT staff is not unreasonable. Xandros server is one to
consider. Xandros installations are typically more oriented towards novice
users, recent Windows refugees, and integration with Windows networks.
Xandros is not as free as Ubuntu. That may or not be a major consideration
for you.
Scott K
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list