Ubuntu small business server

[Jacob]

Senectus,

That all depends how good you are at using Linux. Basically we're talking
apples and extortions here, you know what I mean.... Linux is free, and for
what it's worth, if you have that as a tool in your arsenal, it's a pretty
powerful one. Or, you could answer phones all day saying, "sorry, uhmmm
yeahhh... the system is like... down right now so I'm just not sure about
that.... Maybe call back in an hour once we've got our windows security
patches installed"

Linux just works. It doesn't do other things, that you don't know about
behind the scenes, it just does it's job. That's pretty awesome when it
comes to getting that job done. At Google, everything anywhere that can plug
into a socket somewhere is Linux. And as we are all aware by now, Google is
getting the job done elegantly, and fast.

In fact, many governments in Europe, such as the German, Norweigan, Danish,
Swedish governments, all use Linux. The government of Alberta, Canada uses
Linux as well for some examples.

I would consider windows the solution for the non-programmer who can afford
to pay.

(pshhhh) - Roger that - (pshhhhhhh) - over n out


Jake

><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>¸.
`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>





On 8/15/06, Senectus . <senectus at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/08/06, Jacob <jacobchappelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Need we say any more...
> >
> > Filed under: Opinions, Tech, Satire/Sarcasm — senectus @ 11:12 pm
> >
> >
> > I can't decide what's dumber.
> >  Me, for working late into the night remotely from home and because I
> was
> > tired shutting the server down instead of rebooting it…
> >  Or Microsoft, for have the default choice in their Server 2003 product
> of
> > "Install updates and shutdown" instead of the vastly more logical and
> > expected choice of "Install updates and reboot".
> >
> > Either way the result is me driving back into work at the late hours of
> the
> > night so I can reboot a fricken server.
> >  I really need to get Ilo working so I don't have to do that again.
> >
> LOL
> thanks for that reminder.
> It still doesn't change the fact that the Linux world hasn't even come
> close to the neat little package that is SBS.
>
> there are plenty of negatives to SBS as well, the fact that it's only
> allowed 75 client to attach to it and if you go over that number the
> damn server is designed to _reboot_ and place a nice little message in
> your event log to say "hey you need to pay us more money or I'm going
> to keep rebooting every 60 minutes!". If that's not extortion I don't
> know what is.
>
> By no means do I believe that SBS is a better product than what you
> can eventually do with linux, but it is an out of box solution that
> linux doesn't yet cover as well as MS SBS server.
>
> --
> www.modmeup.net
> Ubuntu Dapper 6.06
> The less you know, the more you believe. - Bono
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>



--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060815/0cd1c33d/attachment.html>