Doesn't Linux have a decent usenet reader?

ac "aec$news" at candt.waitrose.com
Sat Aug 12 12:48:09 UTC 2006


marc wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> About a year ago, I asked Debian users about usenet readers. The 
> selection that I'd tried were, frankly, rubbish compared to what I'd 
> been using on Windows for more than a decade.
> 
> Today, I tried again:
> 
> - Pan: terrible interface that *still* makes the 101 error of displaying 
> threading on subject - often you can't even see the subject, which is 
> bonkers -  and it still doesn't allow locking articles against purging. 
> A-n-d b-o-y i-s i-t k-l-u-n-k-y. It's horrible.
> 
> - Knode: Just terrible - it's windows management is hideous. And it too 
> makes the 101 error of threading on subject. Worse, there is no tagging 
> of articles for download, and articles can't be protected from purging.
> 
> - Thunderbird: Oh dear

I have no problem with thunderbird at all. It was really great to be
able to use it in windows for a while before I moved everything to
linux, and just copy the files into linux. TB is improving constantly.
It sounds like you are happy with windows anyway.
-- 
ac





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list