Using Ubuntu absolves the user of personal responsibility?
Miravlix
dragon at lix-world.net
Thu Aug 3 17:23:20 UTC 2006
tor, 03 08 2006 kl. 16:14 +0100, skrev cantormath:
> _Only_my_opinion_
>
> That use to be the case, and I see the value in pointing someone to a
> man to figure something out. However, ubuntu is trying to draw the
> crowds who dont read mans and grandmas and children, not just the l33t
> crowds of linux/unix users. If people what to be l33t per say, they
> got to learn to read a man, but if my grandma what her email, I dont
> want her having to open terminal to learn how.
This is CLEARLY the wrong way to go as Windows has shown, thats supposed
to babysit, the concept of SAFE computing without user KNOWGLEDE DOES
*NOT* EXIST.
Today Criminals *CONTROLS* the internet and can destroy anyone and
anything as they feel like, companies, users, whatever the criminals
through ZOMBIE computers run by people without the technical skill to be
on the internet has the power to DESTROY anyone and even bring down the
net if you try to fight them. If one of these criminals gets mad at
Ubuntu tomorrow, they can make sure that none of us will ever see
*.ubuntu.com on the Internet again, by running DDOS attack on all
servers in the Ubuntu domain.
This lack of technical skill combined with the LACK OF INTEREST in
learning is clearly the Internets greatest threat.
--
Miravlix <dragon at lix-world.net>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list