Is a restart REALLY required after an upgrade?
Andrew Zajac
arzajac at gmail.com
Wed Apr 12 15:12:09 UTC 2006
On 4/12/06, Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca> wrote:
>
> I can't quite see where this is going. You're talking about two entirely
> different things. In the first place, if you're not running X, you won't
> get a "restart required" notification even if you upgrade a kernel.
I am being sarcastic. The original question was if a reboot was really
required. The answer is not that a reboot is a simpler way of restarting
services because "it's so complicated", but that only certain things require
a reboot, namely the kernel and dbus. I have never heard of a package that
starts a service which then needs the box to be restarted in order to work
properly (other than dbus, which completely makes sense since it is a
low-level hardware communication service).
That would be absurd.
> In
> fact, you won't get it if you use apt-get or aptitude to do your upgrades.
Are you sure? When I run apt-get, the notification icon turns grey. I am
pretty sure that I have installed a kernel via the command line and
gotten the "restart required" icon appropriately.
> Alternately, I would expect there's some sort of API so that the webmin
> maintainer _could_ signal a "restart required" notification if he desired.
I think this is it:
http://www.galago-project.org/specs/notification/index.php
I would assume there already is a policy about what packages are supposed to
trigger it. My argument is that there are only a very small number of
things that need to.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060412/725f104a/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list