Debian dated? [was: Re: Announcement from www.kubuntu.de]
Michael M.
nixlists at writemoore.net
Tue Apr 11 12:40:30 UTC 2006
Daniel Carrera wrote:
>
> Debian is a distro that tries to support all (free) packages more or
> less equally. This has some benefits and drawbacks. On the one hand,
> Debian has a gazillion supported packages, and it supports 12
> architectures. On the other, Debian is usually dated and less newbie
> friendly.
I don't understand where the perception that Debian is dated comes from,
unless you're referring exclusively to the stable branch. That becomes
dated because it doesn't change and nothing gets added except security
updates. And because Debian has (or has had, anyway) a longish release
cycle in comparison with other distros. But Debian's testing and
unstable branches are as up-to-date as any distro, and currently more
up-to-date than Ubuntu Breezy. Isn't an Ubuntu release more-or-less a
snapshot of Debian's unstable branch, with Ubuntu-specific
customizations and configurations?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say Debian is better because it's
more current or Ubuntu is worse because the packages available are
older. Each distro has its own strengths and purposes. I just hear
this claim oft-repeated as sort-of received opinion. I used to presume
it was true, until I started using Debian and realized it is just as
current as anything else, and more current than many at any given time.
New and updated software usually hits Debian's unstable branch as
quickly as it hits any of the reputedly "cutting-edge" distros, and
depending upon the complexity, can make it into testing about a week
later. It takes longer for bigger, more complex packages like a desktop
environment to transition into testing, but not so much longer that
testing lags significantly behind other distros.
Comparing Debian's stable branch with most other distros isn't really
apples-to-apples because stable is geared toward mission-critical uses.
The type of home users who are choosing between or trying out distros
like Ubuntu, (open)SuSE, Gentoo, Fedora, etc., are not going to be
running Debian stable.
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions
of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to
dream." --S. Jackson
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list