very satisfied user

[admin]

what was the original question about AMD 64-bit processors?
my friend has one and he might know, it might be worth asking again

john









On 20/09/2005, at 8:39 PM, Morten W. J. wrote:

> Richard
>
> > Seems like a fine distinction, esp for a Linux distro. And
>
> > to compound the hair splitting, being worthy is not
>
> > necessarily the same as being good.
>
> Probably, but he didn't state that Debian was more unworthy or worse 
> than Ubuntu - only that he got more help on the Ubuntu mailing list 
> than on the debian one.
>
> I just do not think it is fair to let your frustrations, dont get me 
> wrong here, be justified by his joy, and question his experience with 
> Ubuntu.
>
> > BTW I
>
> > noticed on the web forum *other* 64-bit questionners
>
> > who were also unanswered. Is there some secret problem
>
> > with the AMD64 bit version? Gentoo, SuSE, and Knoppix
>
> > all work great on my Athlon 64/motherboard, but not Ubuntu.
>
> Could be. I don't know anything about 64 bits AMD processors apart 
> from them having twice as many bits as 32 bits ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Morten
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1634 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050920/82eb6378/attachment.bin>