Upgrade to breezy

Andrew VanSpronsen avanspronsen at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 21:39:30 UTC 2005


extras is supported? backports is but I do not believe extras is.

avanspronsen

On 9/10/05, HC Brugmans <hcbrugmans at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben Novack wrote:
> > On 9/10/05, Steve Myers <ulist at gs1.ubuntuforums.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Be smart and do a fresh install, I have seen so many users do an upgrade
> >>and that is why you see posts with numerous issues because of doing an
> >>upgrade.
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Steve Myers
> >
> >
> > Well, some of the upgrade issues are because Breezy isn't finalized
> > yet. That's what testing is for; after all, with releases every six
> > months, it would be absurd to ask people to do a fresh install twice a
> > year. A user should only have to install their OS once, and be able to
> > upgrade safely and smoothly every time a new release comes out.
> >
> Upgrade issues are mostly because of people
> 
> A upgrading when the development distro is still unstable.
> B users not having ubuntu-base/ubuntu-desktop packages installed
> C users using backports or extras
> 
> A _should_ be mostly solved.
> Especially B is something that is easily avoidable.
> using backports or extras is supported, but this is still not tested as
> much as doing a straight upgrade, so take caution.
> 
> Hidde
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> 



-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Gmail - Hits the spot! :-)
GPG Key ID: 1024D/F18A34B9 2005-08-27 Andrew VanSpronsen (E-mail key) <
avanspronsen at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050910/cc1bff82/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list