Potentially new user

[albi at scii.nl]

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:19:13 +0100
david <nux at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> KDE tends to have a lot of apps installed and lots of options everywhere
> you look. Gnome tends to be a little slicker (with nicer artwork), with
> less apps and slightly harder to find options. The Ubuntu Gnome way
> seems to be (more or less) 1 program per task rather than several. Both
> KDE and Gnome are customisable. There's loads of stuff (and screenshots)
> available at www.gnome-look.org and www.kde-look.org 
> I started with KDE and found it to be most friendly, I use Gnome now,
> Gnome is beautiful - (imo).

i like the Gnome-look better in general, but comparing the default
file-managers of the two, konqueror is my favorite

using konqueror as webdav-client, sftp-client (fish://), ftp-client,
samba-client works pretty well, while nautilus either won't cooperate
or crashes often (yes, i should learn to bugreport)

-- 
grtjs, albi
lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import