monotux at gmail.com
Sat Oct 29 11:38:41 UTC 2005
Oh dear, I didn't see that "replace" :(
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:17:29 +1000
Peter Garrett <peter.garrett at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Ah, but I *think* he means to replace *all* of gnome, not just metacity!
> In that case , fluxbox is definitely lighter than metacity+gnome.
> No doubt fvwm would be even lighter, of course - it depends how much configuration he wants/ is capable of doing.
> Fluxbox should pretty much work "out of the box" [ yes, i know fvwm does too, but it's definitely less friendly on first meeting ;) ]
(and fvwm's default interface is pretty exciting - if you're a backwater unix guru from the eighties)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ubuntu-users