32/64 bit AMD question
Phillip Susi
psusi at cfl.rr.com
Tue Oct 18 16:24:05 UTC 2005
I think the only difference between the two sockets is the latter has
support for dual memory bank interleaving. It is still fully 64bit. I
also have an older 754 Athlon 64 3200+. I'm not sure if it really makes
a difference or not, but I'm running it in 64 bit mode.
Russell Cook wrote:
> Hi folks,
> firstly thanks to the devs and all in the Ubuntu community and canonical
> for a great release in Breezy, I'm running it on 6 machines and it is
> getting more and more flawless and seamless with every release - well
> done guys (non-gender specific ones :- )
>
> My question relates to the 64 bit versions and the performance of the
> AMD cpu.
>
> I have an AMD 64 system, but with the older 754 pin layout, not the full
> 939 pin 64 bit system. Given this system doesn't have all the pins for
> full 64 bit access to the motherboard (is it only memory????), will I
> see a performance benefit if I migrate to the 64 bit version of Ubuntu?
> Or, is this chip a little crippled, and therefore 32 bit (which in
> theory has no inherent performance penalty in AMD's implementation),
> and 64 bit performance are roughly comparable in this system so there'd
> be no benefit in going to the 64 bit version?
>
> Maybe put another way, what is the performance difference in 64 bit mode
> compared to 32 bit, of the 754 pin and the 939 pin AMD Athlon64's for
> the same clock speed?
>
> I hope that makes sense.
>
> Kind Regards Russell
> ==================
> www.windsorcycles.com.au
> sales at windsorcycles.com.au
> ph. 02 4577 3209
> bikes.no-ip.info
> Linux user #369094
> ==================
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list