Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?

Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshepang at gmail.com
Mon Nov 14 05:22:08 UTC 2005


On 11/13/05, Lee Braiden <lee_b at digitalunleashed.com> wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2005 11:19, Mariusz Kruk wrote:
> > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe napisaƂ(a):
> > > Lovely defence... By the way I hear that loads of server admins tend
> > > to avoid the 2.6 kernels, implying that they regard the 2.4 series
> > > more stable. Can anyone confirm if it's actually so or if it's more of
> > > paranoia?
> >
> > I had oopses on early 2.6 kernels when doing some iptables rules
> > changes. So I stayed with 2.4. Don't have time to test it every time new
> > 2.6 comes out.
>
> Yes, it was horribly unstable at first.  However, it's been quite reliable
> since 2.8 or so, even on PPC, and 2.12 is fine.

I assume you mean 2.6.8 :-)


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list