apt-get vs. Ubuntu Update Manager
johndecarlo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 31 19:36:28 UTC 2005
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:33:28 -0700, Shawn Christopher
<schristopheraz at gmail.com> wrote:
> This afternoon after reading all the E-mail about sound disapearing I
> decided I wanted to break my system so I was going to do an apt-get
> dist-upgrade however it came back as nothing needed to be upgraded. OK,
> fair enough then I ran the Ubuntu Update Manager and it came up with
> alot of updates. What is the difference? Shouldn't both of them read
> from the same sources list?
Others have already given you good answers, but I wanted to summarize
a bit differently.
1. apt-get dist-upgrade - done basically once - when you want to
change the version of the distribution you are using. Then you don't
use it again until it is time to upgrade again.
2. apt-get update - done every day or on a regular basis to update
the list of packages available
3. apt-get upgrade - this actually compares the packages on your
system to the new list generated by the update and sets up a list of
packages to download and install.
So because I love to break my system and be on the bleeding edge, I
usually do the following a couple of times a day:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own
More information about the ubuntu-users