Reiserfs vs ext3

[Jason Straight]

On Tuesday 22 March 2005 13:01, oni wrote:
> Steven Boothe wrote:
> > Jason Straight wrote:
> >> On Monday 21 March 2005 16:57, n6 wrote:
> >>> My general experence is:
> >>>
> >>> ReiserFS is very fast, but EXT3 is more stable, if your machine gets
> >>> power off, with ReiserFS in mt experence  your gona have issues. but
> >>> thats just my experiences.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I agree. And with reiser fs corruption doesn't make much sense,
> >> usually it's just the open rw files that get hosed. But I've seen
> >> reiser mix up things like rc.local and main.cf for postfix even when
> >> the machine didn't go down.
> >
> > Just out of curiousity, which version of ReiserFS are we talking about?
>
> do you talk about reiser3 or 4?

That was 3 when that happened. I haven't dared try again :)


-- 
http://www.skycon.net/
ICQ: 1796276
AIM: JasonRStraight
MSN: glock21-45cal at hotmail.com
OS: Ubuntu/Kubuntu Linux http://www.ubuntu.org/ http://www.kubuntu.org.uk/