Reiserfs vs ext3
oni303 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 18:01:14 UTC 2005
Steven Boothe wrote:
> Jason Straight wrote:
>> On Monday 21 March 2005 16:57, n6 wrote:
>>> My general experence is:
>>> ReiserFS is very fast, but EXT3 is more stable, if your machine gets
>>> power off, with ReiserFS in mt experence your gona have issues. but
>>> thats just my experiences.
>> Yeah, I agree. And with reiser fs corruption doesn't make much sense,
>> usually it's just the open rw files that get hosed. But I've seen
>> reiser mix up things like rc.local and main.cf for postfix even when
>> the machine didn't go down.
> Just out of curiousity, which version of ReiserFS are we talking about?
do you talk about reiser3 or 4?
More information about the ubuntu-users