Reiserfs vs ext3

[oni]

Steven Boothe wrote:

> Jason Straight wrote:
>
>> On Monday 21 March 2005 16:57, n6 wrote:
>>
>>> My general experence is:
>>>
>>> ReiserFS is very fast, but EXT3 is more stable, if your machine gets
>>> power off, with ReiserFS in mt experence  your gona have issues. but
>>> thats just my experiences.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I agree. And with reiser fs corruption doesn't make much sense, 
>> usually it's just the open rw files that get hosed. But I've seen 
>> reiser mix up things like rc.local and main.cf for postfix even when 
>> the machine didn't go down.
>>
>
> Just out of curiousity, which version of ReiserFS are we talking about?
>
do you talk about reiser3 or 4?