corection qt is open source but gtk has no restrictions on use

[Lee Braiden]

On Saturday 23 July 2005 17:14, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> Indeed I am, related but not identical.  I'm also aware that the FSF folks
> prefer you use the GPL over the LGPL, and I know why.  Do you?  Hint: RMS
> treats the LGPL as an unwanted step-child.  Why do think they changed the
> 'L' in its name from 'Library' to 'Lesser'?  Perhaps because they consider
> the GPL to be 'Greater'?  :)  I think its very safe to say that the FSF
> folks are *happier* to see Qt under the GPL rather than the LGPL.

This is an incredibly strange twist you're making in the conversation.  I 
haven't even mentioned the LGPL.

-- 
Lee Braiden
http://www.DigitalUnleashed.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050723/0a920095/attachment.sig>