Switching video cards : "HowTo" ??

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Sun Jan 23 01:34:52 UTC 2005


On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:25:39PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:13:51PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > dpkg-reconfigure passes "reconfigure" to the .config script, while during
> > > upgrades the argument is "configure".
> > 
> > OK, so would you be happy with always stomping the configuration file with
> > reconfiguring (but making a backup), and changing the default when reconfiguring
> > to probing, with a flag to explicitly disable it?  That's what would make the
> > most sense to me.  (Also, always recreating the file when it's deleted.)
> 
> Yes, that sounds about right to me as well.  The configuration file
> definitely should be stomped (with a backup made); the user has explicitly
> asked us to change it in this case.

Right.

> I'm trying to think of use cases where we shouldn't probe by default, but
> none come to mind.  It should ask first, though, in case probing causes
> problems with the user's hardware, so that they can skip it if needed and
> still configure manually.

Well, I'd imagine the main use case for running dpkg-reconfigure in the first
case is 'oh my god, xresprobe got it wrong', in which case you'd want to change
that sort of thing.  But I can see still wanting to probe, and just having the
probe *seed* the default values, so you can change it (but, honestly, it's close
to infallability in Hoary, once I fix a few logic bugs).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050123/cee18fdc/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list