Mozilla Thunderbird

[Erik Bågfors]

Who are you to decide what problem I have?  Evolution works just fine
for only email but also for groupware like situations.  The same can't
be said for thunderbird.  I find the mail-parts of evolution to be
nicer to work with than thunderbird (but you are free to have another
opinion)

It's a logical choise to use evolution and I'm very happy for it. 
Also, it integrated with the gnome desktop in wounderful ways.

But hey, thunderbird is there, use it if you prefer it.

Regards,
Erik

On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:46:54 +0000, Graeme Kerry <graeme.kerry at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Is there any particular reason why Evolution was chosen as the
> standard. It does seem a pretty heavy weight solution (a groupware
> application) to a pretty lightweight problem (email).
> 
> Graeme Kerry
> 
> 
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:22:59 -0500, R S Gill <rsgill at purdue.edu> wrote:
> > Hey Everyone,
> >
> > This is just a suggestion.
> >
> > How about making Mozilla Thunderbird the default e-mail program in Ubuntu.
> >
> > Evolution is very resouce intensive (frequently just sits there
> > "Formating message") and, at least for me, crashes often.  In addition,
> > spam filtering takes a long time.
> >
> > Just from an ease of use and performance perspective, why not default to
> > THunderbird instead.
> >
> > For those who really want/need it, Evolution is but and apt-get away.
> >
> > Gill
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-devel mailing list
> > ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
> >
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>