Website design : what to use ?

[Tony]

I have seen this sluggishness in Bluefish also.  It seemed to occur
for me when I was attempting to edit large text files.  I finally
stopped using Bluefish for this reason and starting using emacs.  An
additional benefit of using emacs (or vi) is the ability to log into
ones server with SSH and modify them on line from virtually any
computer with a command line.


On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:39:44 -0500, TopDog <ulist at gs1.ubuntuforums.org> wrote:
> 
> Vincent Trouilliez Wrote:
> > So far, BlueFish appears promising. But it's painfully slow (several
> > seconds) to paste text, or just typing text really. 
> I've been using BlueFish for a year (only for hobby-sites), and think
> it's pretty fast. Haven't really experiensed any slowness at all on
> either my old laptop (-FC1/Fluxbox, 233Mhz, 128RAM-) or my relative
> fast Shuttle with Ubuntu.
> 
> --
> TopDog
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> 


-- 
I gotta have more cowbell!