This Mailinglist

[kloschi at subsignal.org]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry Sean, for posting this at first to you personally by accident.

On 10 Jan 2005, at 19:35, Sean Miller wrote:

> Well, it seems to me at least that we currently have everybody except 
> Martin who would like "reply-to-list" as the default, and Martin - who 
> appears to be unable to resist making personal insults - seems to be 
> deluding himself that replies to personal e-mails would also end up on 
> the list... of course they won't, because they will be personal and 
> will therefore have the reply-to set to sender.

Agreed.

> In other words, with "reply-to-list" on list e-mails you don't have to 
> think about whether you're replying to a list or a person; the list 
> does that for you... personal ones go to the sender, list ones to the 
> list... in fact it is far *more* likely that with "reply-to-sender", 
> where one has to manually add the list to the send list, that personal 
> e-mails will inadvertently get published.

That includes that the sender declares how he wants the answers by 
setting
a reply-to sender manually. Or - as known from usenet - setting a f'up 
to poster.
And thats absolutely wantable in my eyes.

I'd count the same you do. Is there a democratic way to clear this 
issue one time forever?
A poll, voting or whatever anywhere?
Or could we see the counts in this thread as represantative and ask the 
list manager about changing the
default behaviour?

regards,
kloschi

ps/ apple mail does _not_ have a reply-to list button also.
Its a great MUA and I won't change it as long as I'm on Mac OS X.

- -- its better to burn out than to fade away ..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFB4tSVMuGJaxswwHkRAvzIAJwMoGzBqU47zZeAA78ZndRsq5gmdACaA0Me
ugKQnOpY00vndSNMZgUhkFI=
=GDYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----