Totem: gstreamer or xine?
Andy
andy.choens at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 03:30:05 UTC 2005
On 4/12/05, joelbryan <joelbryanster at gmail.com> wrote:
> The default totem packaged installed in ubuntu is the dummy totem, which use
> the gstreamer framework.
>
> However, I could not play the WMV's, ASF's even installing the w32codecs
> and the gstreamer-plugins. This now point me to installing the totem-xine
> package, that would uninstall the gstreamer framework, which is I believe is
> better than standalone xine, because of integration to GNOME.
>
> I like to view the proprietary files but I like it to use the gstreamer
> framework.
>
> Maybe this is just a wrong installation, I want to ask, is this also
> happening to you after installing the w32codecs and gstreamer-plugins stated
> in the ubuntu tips & tricks procedures.
>
It works ok on my system, although a quick experiment proved that xine
is faster and smoother playing. Over-all gstreamer is still a
resource hog. I'm sure that will improve though. I left gstreamer
and totem installed and installed vlc as my primary client. I think
it's a generally better media player than either xine, mplayer, or
gstreamer. It has more capabilities and is not resource intensice on
my machine. It's about as HIG compliant as a Dr's chart, but it still
works well.
At this time totem/gstreamer isn't as useable.
--andy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Choens
Teen Leadership Program Director
Ramapo For Children
Office: 845 - 876 - 8403
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list