Cracked
John
dingo at coco2.arach.net.au
Tue Oct 19 02:15:27 UTC 2004
Jim Cheetham wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> Jim Cheetham wrote:
>>
>>> John wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you're attached to the Internet, check your logs.
>>>
>>> install logcheck
>>
>> Too slow. It's no use at all to prevent someone from breaking in.
>
>
> Neither is "check your logs" - unless you're staring 24x7 at the log
I am proposing just that. by program. Response time under one second. By
default, you get one chance, no more.
> files, and can type as fast as Tsutomu Shimomura! By default, logcheck
Faster.
> emails summaries once an hour (as I'm sure you know, I'm talking to a
How many people (realistically) do you need to read the logs? Where I
work we have one part-timer. Most home users don't even know to check
the logs.
> wider audience here). These are useful enough to tell you what services
> are being probed, and to allow you to check their config and close them
> down/tighten them up.
Too slow. How many passwords could I check in an hour against sue.ecosm.com?
Realistically, I'd have at least an hour and a half, and if I picked my
time maybe several hours.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list