what a reaction!

[Fabio Mora]

Fred Blaise wrote:

>wow... I can't believe people reacted like that to that default theme...
>I find it rather cool, and as far as I am concerned, conveyed the
>message it intended on my person.
>Having lived over 18 years in western Europe, where you see naked women
>in every TV commercials possible, this is just ridiculous to even have a
>thread named "erotic wallpaper".. I had a good laugh... Can i remind
>people that erotic means: "Of or concerning sexual love and desire" or
>"Tending to arouse sexual desire." (dictionary.com)? If you some of you
>are aroused by those pics, you got more serious problems in your life
>than a couple pictures on a desktop computer...
>Now, having lived in the USA for over 6 years, I can understand the
>reaction of some people... no nudity on TV, etc.. however, don't you
>even adventure yourself in a night-club! I was shocked at how girls
>would rub their behind on your private parties without even knowing you
>or exchanging a word... anyway, off-topic.
>My fiancee lived 8 years in Africa (black Africa), and found the
>reaction of people pretty childish as well, in those threads.
>
>All that to say, much fuss for nothing much, IMHO.
>
>fred
>
>
>  
>
I live in italy, europe, and I am *not* offended by those images and 
splash etc.  at all.
*but* I'd like to choose if I want to see some people on my desktop.
this is the point.
ubuntu logo as a wallpaper is good as default distribution wallpaper. 
then, *if I want*, I can customize that.
a photo with people (naked or not) is another thing.

ok, then, let's put a "jennifer lopez" theme as default! ;o)

imho.

fab'