Subversion update to version 1.08 or 1.1.0?
Scott Litvinoff
scottlit at gmail.com
Tue Oct 5 16:39:24 UTC 2004
Ok, so just to be clear, you guys back-propped the fix to the problem
when using mod_authz_svn to 1.06?
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:18:06 +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:49:20PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Scott Litvinoff wrote:
> > > Do you guys have an ETA for when you will be upversioning the
> > > Subversion packages to 1.08, or better yet, to 1.1.0? I'm gettting
> > > ready to do an installation here at work on a server not based off of
> > > Ubuntu, and I'm trying to decide how I want to work this, since I'd
> > > ideally like to have the exact same version running on the server and
> > > all the clients.
>
> Subversion's compatibility rules are such that I wouldn't expect mixing
> even 1.0 and 1.1 to be a problem, although you won't get some of the new
> features in 1.1 unless both client and server are 1.1. Mixing 1.0.x
> releases should be fine.
>
> > Warty is in a very strict freeze state for the release scheduled for 13
> > October, so we won't be updating subversion in Warty unless it is the best
> > option to fix a bug which is critical to the release. 1.0.8 will enter
> > Hoary as soon as it opens, and 1.1.0 in time.
>
> Note that we do already have the security fix from 1.0.8 in Warty.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson at canonical.com]
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list