gs fonts look like hell

[Jeff Hodges]

Have you tried just pdflatex? I've gotten good results with that.  No
need to convert through a bunch of different filetypes.


On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:45:09 -0500, Michael P. Soulier
<msoulier at digitaltorque.ca> wrote:
> On 18/11/04 Michael P. Soulier said:
> 
> > So, I'm trying to rebuild an old latex document. Doing so, and viewing
> > it in xdvi, doesn't look great but it's acceptable. If I then convert it
> > with dvips to postscript, or dvipdfm to pdf, it looks like absolute
> > hell.
> >
> > I have no idea where to start looking for why these fonts look so bad.
> > Any pointers appreciated. If I build it again my Fedora Core 1 box, it
> > looks fine.
> 
> xpdf gives me some hints. Missing fonts maybe?
> 
> [msoulier at latte temp]$ xpdf callrecording.pdf
> Error (3428): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (3428): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (3494): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (3554): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (3838): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (4021): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (4106): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (4225): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (4740): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (4947): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (5017): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (5017): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (5190): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error: Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> Error (5478): Missing or bad Type3 CharProc entry
> 
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> --
> Michael P. Soulier <msoulier at digitaltorque.ca>
> http://www.digitaltorque.ca
> http://opag.ca      python -c 'import this'
> Jabber: msoulier at digitaltorque.ca
> 
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Jeff