Ubuntu KDE

[Bryan Pizzuti]

Fact is, KDE is heavier because it offers more features that would be of
importance ot a user.  Multiple wireless profiles, multiple power profiles,
all accessible through the KDE Control Center.  GNOME doesn't have this
stuff.

What GNOME DOES have is better applications, such as Pan, GAIM (and GAIM-VV)
and several others.  What either GUI looks like is somewhat irrevalent,
since with enough tweaking you can mke them look identical.  

-----Original Message-----
From: ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com
[mailto:ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Fabio Mora
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 11:50 AM
To: Vincent Trouilliez
Cc: Ubuntu mailing list
Subject: Re: Ubuntu KDE

Vincent Trouilliez wrote:

>I don't understand people who want KDE in Ubuntu. 
>The only, huge big reason why I left Mandrake for Ubuntu, is because I 
>saw Ubuntu as a Heaven for me, Gnome lover. Ubuntu provides:
>
>1) an UNTOUCHED Gnome, in 10 seconds you can get it to look exactly 
>like what you see on Gnome.org screenshots
>
>2) you get the latest version of Gnome
>
>3) you get lightweigth, neat, Gnome ONLY distro with not a bit of KDE 
>'cr*p' that you don't want. It's Gnome and only Gnome, it's CLEAN, 
>inside out.
>
>4) Since you only have Gnome, people at Ubuntu can concentrate on it 
>hence improve the product better and quicker, and offer focused, 
>efficient support.
>
>
>KDE is everywere, if you love it, just pick Mandrake or whatever, they 
>are just mad for KDE, but please leave Ubuntu alone, don't mutilate it 
>with KDE.
>
>
>  
>
holy words, man!

fab'

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users