[CoLoCo] Trouble with Hardy in Qemu
keen101 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 14 18:06:28 BST 2008
I prefer the text based installer too. My first Ubuntu/Linux install
was from a text based install disk.
On another note... the live-cd now had an install option OR the
live-cd. It's not quite like the text installer on the alternate
install discs, but at least it makes it faster to install if that's
the only cd you have on hand.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:25 AM, David Overcash
<funnylookinhat at gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here.... and the alternate installer is faster too since I don't have
> to wait for the GUI to boot up and detect my entire system... I'm glad that
> Ubuntu keeps the text-installer around. :)
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just my $.02. I never use anything but the Alternate Installer. Who
>> except for brain dead mouse pushers needs to boot to a gui livecd in
>> order to install a system to disk. Obviously there are other benefits
>> of a livecd, but (IMO) installation is not one of them. The alternate
>> installer (AFAIK) uses the advance Debian installer that has just
>> worked for a long time now. Sigh, probably not even worth $.02.
>> Collins Richey
>> If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries
>> of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
>> Ubuntu-us-co mailing list
>> Ubuntu-us-co at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> Ubuntu-us-co mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-co at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
More information about the Ubuntu-us-co