[CoLoCo] (no subject)

Wirt wirtwolff at comcast.net
Tue Sep 25 23:18:11 BST 2007


Guess you could hire armed guards and run XTS-400 or some other 
proprietary security oriented OS if that'll help you sleep better. Of 
course the guards could always be bought, disabled or killed.  And 
people would wonder what's so valuable that it's worth securing with 
such expensive measures, so you'd have to protect yourself against 
higher quality attacks.

 Aww, it's hopeless. Might as well get rid of all those pesky passwords. :P

phillip tribble wrote:
> This Linux method to change the hard drive just sounds really 
> dangerous. The best security like you all mentioned is physical security.
Physical security plus matching your precautions to your risk level. 
Most of us are pretty safe with pretty minimal common sense precautions. 
And one great thing about open-source is you have a huge community 
looking for holes to patch.

You've got me curious now. What is it you are so concerned about 
protecting? Sorry, none of my business, really, but now my imagination 
is running wild.

Wirt



More information about the Ubuntu-us-co mailing list