Pulse ?

Billy C blackmaxphoto at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 00:37:13 GMT 2009


On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin at linuxuse.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Billy C schrieb:
>
>
>> A more effective color management system would be needed prior to
>> making the claim that EVERYTHING needed for graphics was present.
>
> Yeah - right. But this is linked to licensing-issues, so I would not
> blame a Linux-Distro for being imperfect in that...
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkl8+BMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNuBwCdGadEWcnsHeqg1ArQRT59jtnD
> qosAniecyTv6oCndB/EvxIkestvVuLOk
> =ZhV5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>

The pieces are already present, were they packaged for easier
installation/included in the distro, that would make the
"all-inclusive multimedia package" a more valid claim, as color
management is ESSENTIAL to billable hours for graphic arts or
photography concerns.
As one of the audio users mentioned earlier, some of us would rather
spend the time with billable hours projects than tweaking and
debugging software.

BC



More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list