44K vs 96K and so on

[Andrew Oikle]

I clearly hear the difference when I record my music at 48khz vs. 44.1khz.
Another extremely important thing to know about sampling rates and
multitrack recording and effect plug-in chains (a mastering engineer told
me), is data bits get mangled in the process, so the higher the sampling
rate the more accurate interpolation you get.  He basically told me, I
should have recorded my project at least at 48khz but ideally 96khz.  It
sounds like the article only applies to two track final mixdowns.  I still
hear a difference.

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Pietro Bergamo <bergamopietro at yahoo.com.br>
wrote:

> Very interesting!
> Do you have the article by Moran/Meyer?
>
> ----- Mensagem original ----
> De: joe atanacio <joesoundguy at gmail.com>
> Para: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion <
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 29 de Maio de 2008 1:49:42
> Assunto: 44K vs 96K and so on
>
>
> Hey folks for all of the fretting we do recording at various sampling rates
> with all kinds of hardware I thought the group would appreciate this
> article.It may help us make some decisions as we buy stuff to do stuff.
>
> http://mixonline.com/recording/mixing/audio_emperors_new_sampling/
>
> --
> Joe
>
> ------------------------------
> Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail<http://br.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/mail/*http://br.mail.yahoo.com/>,
> o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20080530/5230d2df/attachment.htm