Ardour vs. Audacity?

[Christopher Stamper]

Maybe the same reason pro's use ProTools instead of MS SoundRecorder???!!!!
:-)

I suggest using and getting to know both Ardour and Audacity. And if, when
you're done, you still don't see why Ardour is better, then it probably
won't matter to you anyway. Use whatever you like best.

On Jan 4, 2008 10:25 AM, Bharani Prasanth Sure <bharaniprasanth at hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
> I really don't understand what makes ardour an inevitable option  Except
> the automation a control and a few plugins Its all the same.Like I am a
> beginner too.So please donoit misunderstandme for testing your
> awareness...Where is the complexity..?
>
>
> Best Regards,Bharani Prasanth Sure.
>
> ________________________________
> > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:28:56 -0500
> > From: christopherstamper at gmail.com
> > To: mark at msbrepairs.com; ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Subject: Re: Ardour vs. Audacity?
> >
> > Ardour is definitely the best. Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT
> audio. So it won't help at all. (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not
> audio).
> >
> > Audacity is more for the beginners, who don't really care about multiple
> tracks, quality or control. It may have a couple nice features, but overall,
> it is not the best.
> >
> > Just spend a few hours playing around with Ardour, it's really not that
> hard to use once you understand it. And it is well worth the effort!
> >
> > On Jan 4, 2008 12:27 AM, Mark Stuart Burge < mark at msbrepairs.com> wrote:
> > I would definitely recommend ardour if you want to record multi track
> > and have any level of control.
> > Audacity is great for single track recording and chopping the results
> > up, filtering etc and then exporting, but when it comes to recording
> > multiple parts, lining them up, mixing down, automating fades, pan and
> > inserts then ardour makes it all easy.
> >
> > The learning curve is not that huge if that is all you need to do. It
> > just takes a little getting used to.
> >
> > Ardour I think is heading in the direction of midi compatibility also,
> > which will be great if they do get there, as it will save having to
> > learn yet another application just for the the times when you need to
> > use synths etc.
> >
> > Also,  ardour is likely to be around for a long time, so it is worth
> > your investment (in time and effort as well as hopefully financially to
> > support the developers)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> > Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christopher Stamper
> > christopherstamper at gmail.com
> > http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Post free property ads on Yello Classifieds now! www.yello.in
> http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=221
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>



-- 
Christopher Stamper
christopherstamper at gmail.com
http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20080104/d590210d/attachment.htm