[ubuntu-studio-devel] Shouldn't rtirq become a systemd unit?

Len Ovens len at ovenwerks.net
Thu Aug 6 15:41:03 UTC 2015

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> Is there a reason that rtirq for Ubuntu Studio still is an init file for
> sysvinit or upstart usage and the used init process is ignored?
> What's the idea behind using systemd for the init process, but using
> wrappers to start init files instead of systemd unites?

sysinit vs upstart is one area that debian and ubuntu differed rather a 
lot. I think most of the coversion work has been changing the upstart 
stuff. As systemd can deal with any of the sysinit stuff as is, that has 
been left. With rtirq, it will be either a direct import from debian or 
one of us dealing with it... which means having time to learn systemd.

Len Ovens

More information about the ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list