[ubuntu-studio-devel] Shouldn't rtirq become a systemd unit?
len at ovenwerks.net
Thu Aug 6 15:41:03 UTC 2015
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Is there a reason that rtirq for Ubuntu Studio still is an init file for
> sysvinit or upstart usage and the used init process is ignored?
> What's the idea behind using systemd for the init process, but using
> wrappers to start init files instead of systemd unites?
sysinit vs upstart is one area that debian and ubuntu differed rather a
lot. I think most of the coversion work has been changing the upstart
stuff. As systemd can deal with any of the sysinit stuff as is, that has
been left. With rtirq, it will be either a direct import from debian or
one of us dealing with it... which means having time to learn systemd.
More information about the ubuntu-studio-devel